Skip to main content
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF
BREWING CHEMISTS

DEI Image
Join | Renew | Contact | Log In
Search
  • About
    • Research Council
    • Directories
    • DEI Resources
    • Social Media Kit
    • Contact Us
  • Membership
    • My ASBC Account
    • Join
    • Renew
    • ASBC Connect Community
    • Job Center
    • Student Resources
    • Awards
    • Volunteer
    • Apply for Funding
    • Corporate Membership
  • Methods
    • Methods of Analysis
    • About
    • Tools
    • FAQ
    • Subscription Options
  • In the Lab
    • Methods Videos
    • Lab Proficiency Program
    • Reference Materials and Gauges
    • Fishbone References
    • Grow Your Own Lab
    • Sensory Analysis
    • Sampling Plan
    • Green Chemistry
  • Publications
    • Journal
    • Books
    • Technical Committee Reports
    • Advertise
  • EventsCurrently selected
    • Brewing Summit 2025
    • Webinars
    • WBC Rewind
    • Meeting Archives
  • Store
Skip navigation links
Program & Events
Proceedings
Premeeting Workshops
Oral Sessions
Posters
Workshops
Special Interest Sessions
Speakers
2015 Exhibitors
Beer Donation
Photo Album
American Society of Brewing ChemistsEventsMeeting Archives2015 MeetingProceedings

Display Title
banner 53. Comparison of tetrad and triangle testing as an applicable discrimination test

Page Content

A. DONELAN (1), M. Becher (1), A. Vaughn (2), A. Fritsch (2); (1) The Boston Beer Company, Cincinnati, OH, U.S.A.; (2) The Boston Beer Company, Boston, MA, U.S.A. 

Poster Presentation

Panelist availability is a primary struggle for many sensory programs. This creates challenges in obtaining statistically powerful results and can lead to improper conclusions. A triangle test is the most widely used difference test. However, it requires a large number of panelists to obtain results with confidence. The tetrad test is a new alternative method. In this study, we will compare not only the theory of tetrad versus triangle but the practical application as well. Panelists evaluated products using both tetrad and triangle tests with known differences in diacetyl. The results of this study indicate the tetrad test is more operationally powerful and applicable than the triangle test.

Amy Donelan received a B.S. degree in food science and technology from the University of Tennessee. She worked in the Kansas State University Sensory and Consumer Research Labs for 2 years before starting as a sensory technologist at the Samuel Adams brewery in Cincinnati, OH.

View Presentation


About

Join

Contact

Advertise

Privacy Policy

Email Deliverability