Skip to main content
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF
BREWING CHEMISTS

DEI Image
Join | Renew | Contact | Log In
Search
  • About
    • Research Council
    • Directories
    • DEI Resources
    • Social Media Kit
    • Contact Us
  • Membership
    • My ASBC Account
    • Join
    • Renew
    • ASBC Connect Community
    • Job Center
    • Student Resources
    • Awards
    • Volunteer
    • Apply for Funding
    • Corporate Membership
  • Methods
    • Methods of Analysis
    • About
    • Tools
    • FAQ
    • Subscription Options
  • In the Lab
    • Methods Videos
    • Lab Proficiency Program
    • Reference Materials and Gauges
    • Fishbone References
    • Grow Your Own Lab
    • Sensory Analysis
    • Sampling Plan
    • Green Chemistry
  • Publications
    • Journal
    • Books
    • Technical Committee Reports
    • Advertise
  • EventsCurrently selected
    • Brewing Summit 2025
    • Webinars
    • WBC Rewind
    • Meeting Archives
  • Store
Skip navigation links
2023 Quality Course
2023 ASBC Meeting
2021 Meeting
2019 ASBC Meeting
2019 ASBC Quality Course
2019 Joint Yeast Symposium
2018 Meeting
2017 Meeting
2016 World Brewing Congress
2015 Meeting
2014 Meeting
Proceedings
Program & Events
Exhibitors
Sponsors
Photo Album
2013 Meeting
2012 World Brewing Congress
2011 Meeting
American Society of Brewing ChemistsEventsMeeting Archives2014 MeetingProceedings

Display Title

A-34: Playing second fiddle: Making wheat malt user-friendly

Page Content

K. L. CHRISTIANSEN (1), X. Yin (1); (1) Cargill-Malt, Minneapolis, MN, U.S.A.

Raw Materials
Thursday, June 5 - 2:00 p.m.-3:45 p.m.
Level 4, Red Lacquer Ballroom

Due to the relatively small market for wheat malt in North America, soft white wheat (SWW) varieties are bred for baking not brewing. For brewers, the higher protein and polysaccharide contents of SWW can lead not only to suboptimal brewhouse yields but also to extended lautering times and issues with filtering and fermenting the wort and may impact beer flavor in the bottle. Selection criteria for the maltster and brewer are usually based on agronomic yields, market attractiveness, and the resulting wheat malt’s viscosity, not flavor. The viscosity of wheat malt is not solely related to beta-glucan content. Arabinoxylans (AX) contribute significantly to wort viscosity. SWWs have varying levels of AX and do not behave as beta-glucans do. This study was focused on identifying better performing SWW varieties in the malt house and brewhouse that met certain agronomic thresholds, along with identifying malting conditions to reduce viscosity and filtration time. A wide range of wheat varieties from Oregon, Idaho, Washington, Michigan, and Wisconsin were micromalted under varying conditions, including gibberellic acid application to assess the impact on malt quality parameters, including extract, color, viscosity, and enzyme activity. In some cases, viscosity was reduced by nearly 15% with processing modifications and extract and alpha-amylase increased by more than 5 and 100%, respectively. By selecting the appropriate wheat variety and malting process based on the scientific insight obtained in the present study, wheat malt need not play second fiddle to barley malt.

Katrina Christiansen received a Ph.D. degree in agricultural engineering from Iowa State University in Ames in 2011. She is the Cargill Malt North American Pilot Project lead in Spiritwood, ND, supervising the innovation efforts in both the pilot malting and brewing facilities.

View Presentation

Purchase and login is required to access presentations. Purchase access to the Proceedings.


About

Join

Contact

Advertise

Privacy Policy

Email Deliverability