Skip to main content
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF
BREWING CHEMISTS

DEI Image
Join | Renew | Contact | Log In
Search
  • About
    • Research Council
    • Directories
    • DEI Resources
    • Social Media Kit
    • Contact Us
  • Membership
    • My ASBC Account
    • Join
    • Renew
    • ASBC Connect Community
    • Job Center
    • Student Resources
    • Awards
    • Volunteer
    • Apply for Funding
    • Corporate Membership
  • Methods
    • Methods of Analysis
    • About
    • Tools
    • FAQ
    • Subscription Options
  • In the Lab
    • Methods Videos
    • Lab Proficiency Program
    • Reference Materials and Gauges
    • Fishbone References
    • Grow Your Own Lab
    • Sensory Analysis
    • Sampling Plan
    • Green Chemistry
  • PublicationsCurrently selected
    • Journal
    • Books
    • Technical Committee Reports
    • Advertise
  • Events
    • Brewing Summit 2025
    • Webinars
    • WBC Rewind
    • Meeting Archives
  • Store
Skip navigation links
2017
2016
2015
1977-2014
American Society of Brewing ChemistsPublicationsJournalVolume Years2015

Display Title
Comparison of Factors Involved in Starch Degradation in Barley Germination Under Laboratory and Malting Conditions (1,2)






Page Content
​Barley has long been the model plant for the physiological studies of starch degradation and germination. The majority of barley germination research was and is conducted using various laboratory germination methods. The extrapolation of knowledge obtained in laboratory barley germination studies to malting is commonplace but could prove problem­atic because of the differences between the two techniques. Grains were laboratory-germinated (LG) or micromalted (MM) and sampled daily from 0 to 5 days after imbibition/steeping. α-Amylase and β-amylase activities and protein levels along with starch, osmolyte concentration (OC), and sugar (glucose, sucrose, fructose, maltose, maltotriose, malto­tetraose, maltopentaose, maltohexaose, and maltoheptaose) concentra­tions were determined. Two α-amylase isoforms were detected in LG and MM grains. In LG grains, an approximately 50-kDa isoform was the predominant isoform early in germination and, as germination proceeded, was degraded to an approximately 40-kDa isoform. In MM grains, the 40-kDa isoform was the predominant form, and levels increased as germi­nation proceeded. β-Amylase activity remained constant throughout both LG and MM treatments. However, LG grain β-amylase underwent more proteolytic processing than MM grain β-amylase. Maltose, maltotriose, maltotetraose, maltopentaose, maltohexaose, total sugars, and OC all accumulated one day later in LG grains. The imbibition/steeping time was the critical step in determining the accumulation patterns, and the shorter imbibition/steeping time commonly used in laboratory germina­tion experiments appears to have caused the one-day delay in sugar and OC accumulation. However, it did not explain the protein processing differences. Thus, intrinsic differences between the LG and MM proce­dures that cause differences in sugar accumulation and protein processing must be accounted for when trying to extrapolate data obtained using laboratory germination procedures to malting. Keywords: α-Amylase, β-Amylase, Germination, Malting, Maltose, Os­molyte

About

Join

Contact

Advertise

Privacy Policy

Email Deliverability